Articles of association review in Switzerland

An articles of association review in Switzerland starts from a narrower question than the same exercise elsewhere: not whether the constitution reads well, but whether it still matches what the board of directors, the general meeting and the commercial register each require of a Swiss stock corporation or limited company. The review checks amendment procedure, board residency and beneficial owner disclosure against the current text, and flags where the two have drifted apart. For a foreign-owned group, that drift is usually where the exposure sits.

A holding company doing business in Switzerland through a wholly-owned subsidiary discovers, three years after incorporation, that its articles still name a signing structure the board changed informally at the last two meetings. The minute book records the change. The commercial register does not. Nobody treated this as a problem until a bank asked for a current extract before releasing a facility.

This page sets out what the review confirms in Switzerland specifically, where the filing consequence bites, and where the firm's advisory role ends.

• Articles of association review – the practice, across jurisdictions
• How a shareholders' agreement interacts with the articles
• Who inside the company should own this review

What changes in Switzerland for an articles of association review

The generic version of this work asks three questions of any constitution: does it still reflect how the board of directors actually operates, does it still match what shareholders agreed outside the document, and does it still say what the register shows. In Switzerland, two of those three questions have a formal answer built into company law, and the review has to test against that formal answer rather than against a general sense of good practice.

Any amendment to the articles of association requires a resolution of the general meeting and must be recorded in a public deed before it has legal effect. 01

That single requirement changes the shape of the review. It is not enough to redline the document and circulate it for board sign-off, because a board resolution does not amend the articles on its own. The review has to trace every clause that has, in practice, been superseded by a later shareholder decision, and confirm whether that decision ever went through the formal amendment route or whether it sits, unrecorded, as an informal understanding the constitution does not reflect.

The local test that drives articles of association review in Switzerland

The second Swiss-specific test concerns the board itself, not the document. Swiss company law imposes a residency condition on who may sign for the company, and the articles have to be checked against the people who actually hold that authority today, not the people named when the company was formed.

At least one member of the board of directors, or one person with signing authority, must be resident in Switzerland. 02

A group restructuring its Swiss board after a change of director appointment terms elsewhere in the structure often moves the resident member out without replacing the function, on the assumption that the residency condition attaches to the group rather than to a named individual. It does not. The review checks the current board list against this test directly, because a lapse is not something the articles disclose on their own; the constitution can be silent on residency and still leave the company in breach.

The third test sits outside the board entirely, in the shareholder register rather than the constitution, but the review has to cover it because the two are read together by anyone assessing the structure from outside.

A company must record its beneficial owners holding more than a quarter of the shares or voting rights, and shareholders are obliged to report that holding to the company. 03

Where the articles restrict transfers or attach conditions to share ownership, as many Swiss constitutions do, an unreported beneficial owner is not simply an administrative gap. It is a point at which the transfer restriction the articles describe cannot be checked against the register the law requires the company to keep, and the two documents stop confirming each other. Once a transfer has gone through on the strength of an incomplete register, the position on record cannot be reconstructed; it can only be corrected going forward, and the correction itself becomes visible on the file.

The filing and register consequence in Switzerland

An amendment to the articles of association takes legal effect only once it is entered in the commercial register, and the amended text becomes part of the public file at that point. 04

This is the fact that most changes the practical sequence of the work. A board that agrees a change internally, updates its minute book and treats the matter as settled has not, in Swiss law, amended the articles at all. Until the statutory filing reaches the register, the previous text is the operative one, and any transaction that relies on the new provision is relying on a document that does not yet exist for third parties. Counterparties checking the extract will see the old text.

That gap between internal agreement and registered effect is where a second consequence attaches, and it does not run in the group's favour. If a transaction closes on the assumption that an amendment already applies, and the amendment is only entered on the register afterwards, the closing cannot be treated as compliant retrospectively; the remedy that would have been available before entry, withholding closing until registration, ceases to be available once the transaction has already completed.

The review therefore sequences the work around the register, not around the board calendar: confirm the current registered text first, identify every clause the board or shareholders believe has changed, and treat nothing as settled until the filing is on record.

What this service does not include in Switzerland

The review does not include acting as, supplying, sourcing or arranging a director, a secretary, a nominee shareholder or a trustee, and it does not include any activity for which a Swiss trust or corporate service provider licence is required. This is not a preference. Advising on whether a board satisfies the residency test is legal analysis; filling that seat with a person the firm proposes is a licensed activity in Switzerland, and the firm holds no such licence anywhere it advises.

What the review does produce, within that boundary, is concrete: the amendment procedure mapped against the current text, the board's signing authority checked against the residency test, the beneficial owner register checked against the transfer restrictions in the articles, and a marked-up constitution identifying every clause that no longer matches what the register or the minute book shows. Where a resident director function needs filling, that is a separate, licensed engagement, and the review says so rather than leaving the gap unnamed.

• Current registered text checked against every later board or shareholder decision
• Board composition checked against the residency requirement
• Beneficial owner register checked against transfer restrictions in the articles
• Marked-up constitution identifying clauses no longer matched by the file

A related question, sequencing a review against a pending buy-out or valuation exercise, is covered separately for Switzerland: buy-out valuation mechanics in Switzerland. Where the comparison is against a different offshore regime rather than a Swiss one, the same review structure applied in the Abu Dhabi Global Market is set out at articles review in the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

Frequently asked questions

What happens if articles of association review in Switzerland is not addressed?

The constitution on file stops matching how the board actually operates, and the mismatch is usually discovered by a counterparty, a bank or an auditor rather than by the company itself. By that point the fix is a formal amendment through the general meeting, not a quiet correction of the minute book.

How often should articles of association review in Switzerland be reviewed?

There is no fixed statutory interval. The trigger is an event, not a calendar: a change of director, a share transfer above the beneficial ownership threshold, a restructuring of signing authority, or a transaction that will be tested against the current text.

Does articles of association review in Switzerland change for a foreign-owned company?

The amendment procedure and the residency test apply identically regardless of ownership. What differs in practice is that a foreign-owned group is more likely to have moved a resident board member without registering the replacement, because the change is treated as internal rather than as a filing event.

What does articles of association review in Switzerland require in practice?

Checking the registered text against three things: the last general meeting resolution, the current board's compliance with the residency requirement, and the beneficial owner register. A review that skips any of the three leaves a gap the register will not disclose on its own.

Who inside the company is responsible for articles of association review in Switzerland?

The board of directors carries the legal responsibility for keeping the articles accurate, since it is the board that proposes amendments to the general meeting. In practice the task is usually delegated to whoever maintains the minute book, which is precisely why the minute book and the register drift apart.

A structure that relies on informal board decisions to change what the articles say, rather than on the registered amendment procedure, is carrying an exposure that only becomes visible when someone outside the company checks the extract against the minute book.

Review your appointment terms

Write to info@hreithlaw.com with the jurisdiction and the structure.

MiraHolzner, expert author. Mira advises on constitutional documents and governance structures for cross-border groups, with a focus on board composition, amendment procedure and the interaction between shareholder agreements and articles of association. Her work concentrates on structures where a constitution has drifted from how the board actually operates.